<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Themeless Cover Gallery (BoyC, Fury, Defenders)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/kirby/archives/278/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/kirby/archives/278</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Greatest Comics Artist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:48:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/kirby/archives/278/comment-page-1#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/kirby/2005/02/28/themeless-cover-gallery-boyc-fury-defenders/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>I love the earlier Defenders issues. If I remember Keith Giffen was drawing in  Kirby style in those issues.  I did not like the surreal tone the book taken in later years and stopped buying it. The Defenders were best with the orginal lineup. 

Remember the first issues with Sub-Mariner, Dr. Strange, Hulk and Silver Surfer? Those were the better ones. 

Had the book left the lineup alone I believe it would have been more popular. Instead the book deteriorated to nonsense. At that point I just bought more of the traditional super hero material.  Why the Defenders took the direction it did...I&#039;ll never know what Marvel had in mind.

It&#039;s too bad because the Defenders original line up had so much conflict to offer..and it was diluted with secondary characters that didn&#039;t have the interesting qualities of Subby and Silver Surfer....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the earlier Defenders issues. If I remember Keith Giffen was drawing in  Kirby style in those issues.  I did not like the surreal tone the book taken in later years and stopped buying it. The Defenders were best with the orginal lineup. </p>
<p>Remember the first issues with Sub-Mariner, Dr. Strange, Hulk and Silver Surfer? Those were the better ones. </p>
<p>Had the book left the lineup alone I believe it would have been more popular. Instead the book deteriorated to nonsense. At that point I just bought more of the traditional super hero material.  Why the Defenders took the direction it did&#8230;I&#8217;ll never know what Marvel had in mind.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad because the Defenders original line up had so much conflict to offer..and it was diluted with secondary characters that didn&#8217;t have the interesting qualities of Subby and Silver Surfer&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/kirby/archives/278/comment-page-1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/kirby/2005/02/28/themeless-cover-gallery-boyc-fury-defenders/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>I like the way Kirby draws Doc Strange as well. IMO, Kirby couldn&#039;t draw Spider-Man very well most of the time, and Ditko couldn&#039;t get the Thing down, but Ditko did a nice version of the Torch, while Kirby had a good take on Doc Strange on many a Strange Tales cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way Kirby draws Doc Strange as well. IMO, Kirby couldn&#8217;t draw Spider-Man very well most of the time, and Ditko couldn&#8217;t get the Thing down, but Ditko did a nice version of the Torch, while Kirby had a good take on Doc Strange on many a Strange Tales cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

